← Team Metrics
Latest

Houston Rockets

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the Houston Rockets in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

HOU 2025-26: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding, Rim protection, Interior finishing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Reed Sheppard, Clint Capela, Steven Adams. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionFirst to second apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2026 · 8 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
100th percentile
Amen Thompson carries 27.0%
Availability: Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2025-26 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Amen Thompson supplied 27.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. A major strength was at risk in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim protection
100th percentile
Jabari Smith Jr. carries 24.8%
Availability: Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2025-26 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Jabari Smith Jr. supplied 24.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. A major strength was at risk in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Interior finishing
96th percentile
Kevin Durant carries 23.2%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2025-26 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.8 league percentile. Kevin Durant supplied 23.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 6 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — full situation-room coverage available.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileAmen Thompson · 29.7%Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileReed Sheppard · 25.6%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength96th percentileKevin Durant · 23.2%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength79th percentileAmen Thompson · 30.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDorian Finney-SmithRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength100th percentileAmen Thompson · 27.0%Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileAmen Thompson · 36.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength100th percentileJabari Smith Jr. · 24.8%Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDorian Finney-SmithRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileKevin Durant · 34.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDorian Finney-SmithRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Reed Sheppard
Single-skill dependence

HOU did not have strong functional backup for Reed Sheppard in event creation; removing him cost about 25.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Amen Thompson.

rotation 55%loses 25.6% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Reed Sheppard

Kevin Durant · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr. · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 6.249 over 547 possessions

on floor 4,059 possessions · off floor 3,317 possessions

Clint Capela
Lineup performance dependence

HOU lineups performed 3.4 points per 100 possessions better with Clint Capela than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kevin Durant, Alperen Sengun, Jabari Smith Jr., Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] over 547 possessions.

rotation 22%loses 10.3% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Clint Capela

Kevin Durant · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr. · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 6.249 over 547 possessions

on floor 1,644 possessions · off floor 5,790 possessions

Steven Adams
Lineup performance dependence

HOU lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Steven Adams than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kevin Durant, Alperen Sengun, Jabari Smith Jr., Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] over 547 possessions.

rotation 17%loses 3.9% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Steven Adams

Kevin Durant · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr. · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 6.249 over 547 possessions

on floor 1,251 possessions · off floor 6,184 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Kevin Durant

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Amen Thompson

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Amen Thompson

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Kevin Durant

Creation

Absences repeatedly put a strength at risk

created in 1 · strength at risk in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Amen Thompson

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly put a strength at risk

created in 1 · strength at risk in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Amen Thompson

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly put a strength at risk

created in 1 · strength at risk in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jabari Smith Jr.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was operating in a first-apron restricted state.
Selected player charges
$198.2M
Share of cap
128%
Tax line
$10.3M over
First apron
$2.25M over
Second apron
$9.62M under

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 87% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $198,199,795Source-reported payroll: $199,783,669 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.