← Team Metrics
Latest

Houston Rockets

2024-25
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Houston Rockets in 2024-25, and what needed front-office attention?

HOU 2024-25: the clearest roster problems were Screening, Shooting and spacing. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding, Rim protection, Defensive event creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Amen Thompson, Jabari Smith Jr., Steven Adams. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported9 supported · 2 withheld
Cap positionFirst to second apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2025 · 13 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
96th percentile
Amen Thompson carries 27.1%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2024-25 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.8 league percentile. Amen Thompson supplied 27.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim protection
92nd percentile
Alperen Sengun carries 27.7%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2024-25 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 91.7 league percentile. Alperen Sengun supplied 27.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Defensive event creation
79th percentile
Amen Thompson carries 26.7%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2024-25 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 79.2 league percentile. Amen Thompson supplied 26.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Screening
0th percentile
Fred VanVleet carries 32.4%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2024-25 Screening: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Fred VanVleet supplied 32.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 8 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
21st percentile
Dillon Brooks carries 25.7%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

HOU 2024-25 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 20.8 league percentile. Dillon Brooks supplied 25.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 3 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league71st percentileAlperen Sengun · 26.2%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength79th percentileAmen Thompson · 26.7%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league71st percentileAmen Thompson · 18.4%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league63rd percentileAlperen Sengun · 28.9%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldFred VanVleetRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength96th percentileAmen Thompson · 27.1%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileAmen Thompson · 29.6%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength92nd percentileAlperen Sengun · 27.7%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileFred VanVleet · 32.4%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem21st percentileDillon Brooks · 25.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldFred VanVleetRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Amen Thompson
Single-skill dependence

HOU did not have strong functional backup for Amen Thompson in event creation; removing him cost about 26.7% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Fred VanVleet.

rotation 57%loses 26.7% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Amen Thompson

Fred VanVleet · Dillon Brooks · Jalen Green · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr.

shrunk net 2.525 over 859 possessions

on floor 4,454 possessions · off floor 3,307 possessions

Jabari Smith Jr.
Lineup performance dependence

HOU lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Jabari Smith Jr. than without him. The best supported alternative was [Dillon Brooks, Jalen Green, Alperen Sengun, Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] over 287 possessions.

rotation 43%loses 17.0% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jabari Smith Jr.

Dillon Brooks · Jalen Green · Alperen Sengun · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 7.891 over 287 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,347 possessions · off floor 4,424 possessions

Steven Adams
Lineup performance dependence

HOU lineups performed 5.1 points per 100 possessions better with Steven Adams than without him. The best supported alternative was [Dillon Brooks, Jalen Green, Alperen Sengun, Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] over 287 possessions.

rotation 22%loses 9.6% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Steven Adams

Dillon Brooks · Jalen Green · Alperen Sengun · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 7.891 over 287 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,644 possessions · off floor 6,097 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Screening

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Fred VanVleet

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Dillon Brooks

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was operating in a first-apron restricted state.
Selected player charges
$178.8M
Share of cap
127%
Tax line
$8.03M over
First apron
$715K over
Second apron
$10.1M under

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 90% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $140,588,000Luxury tax line: $170,814,000First apron: $178,132,000Second apron: $188,931,000Selected player charges: $178,846,600Source-reported payroll: $171,038,023 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available9 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.