Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

As ofLatest

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

Team	Branches	Open paths	Needs planning	Needs evidence	Needs dated test	Path abstentions	Basketball gaps
SAS SAS has 22 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	20	1	2	22	45	6
LAC LAC has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	17	0	1	18	37	6
MEM MEM has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	17	0	1	18	37	6
BOS BOS has 16 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	16	0	16	16	16	4
SAC SAC has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	2	20	18	18	0
CHI CHI has 14 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	14	0	14	14	14	0
ORL ORL has 14 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	14	0	14	14	14	0
PHI PHI has 14 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	14	0	14	14	14	6
POR POR has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	14	13	1	1	14	28	0
CHO CHO has 12 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	12	0	12	12	12	0
TOR TOR has 12 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	12	12	0	0	12	24	0
UTA UTA has 14 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	12	2	16	14	14	0
WAS WAS has 12 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	12	12	0	0	12	24	0
NYK NYK has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	11	1	13	12	12	0
ATL ATL has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	10	0	10	10	10	4
CLE CLE has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	10	0	10	10	10	10
GSW GSW has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	10	0	0	10	20	4
MIN MIN has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	10	0	10	10	10	0
OKC OKC has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	10	0	0	10	20	0
PHX PHX has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	10	0	0	10	20	2
DAL DAL has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	9	1	11	10	10	0
MIL MIL has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	9	1	11	10	10	0
DEN DEN has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	8	0	0	8	16	2
IND IND has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	8	0	0	8	16	0
LAL LAL has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	8	0	8	8	8	0
MIA MIA has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	8	0	0	8	16	0
BRK BRK has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	6	0	6	6	6	0
DET DET has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	6	0	6	6	6	6
HOU HOU has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	6	6	0	0	6	12	2
NOP NOP has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	6	6	0	0	6	12	2

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.